On 9 March 2023, the European Court of Justice delivered its long-awaited judgment in the Aquind-case shedding light on the intensity of review conducted by the boards of appeal of European Union agencies. This case concerned the Board of Appeal of the European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) which limited itself to assessing manifest errors of assessment in its decision-making. The Court struck down this limited approach; the ACER Board of Appeal consists of both legal and technical experts and therefore must, in principle, conduct a full review of the agency’s decision. This judgment is significant as it relates to the quality of (quasi-)judicial control of administrative decision-making. This blog post aims to discuss this judgment and its implications for the system of judicial review in the EU.
Author: Sofie Oosterhuis
Sofie Oosterhuis is a PhD Candidate in European Administrative Law at Utrecht University affiliated with the Utrecht Centre for Regulation and Enforcement in European (RENFORCE) and Empirical Research for Institutions for conflict resolution (ERI). Her research focuses on the boards of appeal of European Union agencies.